Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs Realme C61

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (2025) runs on the Google Tensor G5, while the Realme C61 (2024) runs on the Unisoc Tiger T612; estimated prices are $1799 and $156. By overall MobileRank rating, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold leads — 38/100 vs 19/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold has the bigger battery (5015 mAh vs 5000); the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is faster in AnTuTu (1,553,009 vs 200,000); the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold has NFC for contactless payments, the Realme C61 doesn't; the Realme C61 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 258g).

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is noticeably better than the Realme C61 — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Performance 32
Display 100
Camera 31
Battery 42
Design 0
Value for money 0
Realme C61
Performance 0
Display 50
Camera 0
Battery 36
Design 65
Value for money 99
What makes Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 1553009 vs 200000
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2276 vs 360
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 6173 vs 1250
  • Bigger battery: 5015 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 30W vs 15W
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (32/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better camera (31/100 vs 0/100)
  • Longer battery life (42/100 vs 36/100)
  • Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
What makes Realme C61 better?
  • Lighter: 188g vs 258g
  • Cheaper: $156 vs $1799

  • Better design/ergonomics (65/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better value for money (99/100 vs 0/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs the Realme C61, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold scores 19 points higher (38/100 vs 19/100). In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold leads (32/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold leads (31/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Realme C61 leads (99/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold significantly outperforms the Realme C61 (32/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold significantly outperforms the Realme C61 (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold significantly outperforms the Realme C61 (31/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is a bit better (42/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Realme C61 significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (65/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Realme C61 significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (99/100 vs 0/100).

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold: The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is a better fit for everyday use.
Realme C61: The Realme C61 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold Realme C61
Processor Google Tensor G5 Unisoc Tiger T612
AnTuTu 1553009 200000
Geekbench Single 2276 360
Geekbench Multi 6173 1250
Display 8.0" Super Actua Flex LTPO OLED 6.7" IPS LCD
Resolution 2152x2076 720x1600
Refresh rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Battery 5015 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 30W 15W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
Main camera 48 MP
Ultrawide 10 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 0 MP
Front camera 10 MP 5 MP
RAM 16GB 6GB / 8GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 Android 14, Realme UI
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits 560 nits
NFC yes no
Protection IP68 IP54
Dimensions 155.2×150.4×5.2 mm 167.3×76.7×7.8 mm
Weight 258 g 188 g
Price $1799 $156
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
  • Main: 48MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 10MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
31
camera
Realme C61
  • Main: —
  • Front: 5MP
0
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
  • 8.0" Super Actua Flex LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2152x2076
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Realme C61
  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
50
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
  • 5015 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • Wireless: 15W
42
battery
Realme C61
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 15W
  • No wireless charging
36
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and Realme C61, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold Google Tensor G5
38/100
1553009 AnTuTu
Realme C61 Unisoc Tiger T612
19/100 -676.5%
200000 AnTuTu

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold leads Realme C61 by 676.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
$1799
Realme C61
$156

Price difference: $1643. Realme C61 is cheaper by $1643.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold significantly outperforms the Realme C61 (32/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold significantly outperforms the Realme C61 (100/100 vs 50/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold significantly outperforms the Realme C61 (31/100 vs 0/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is a bit better (42/100 vs 36/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Realme C61 significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (65/100 vs 0/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Realme C61 significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (99/100 vs 0/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold or the Realme C61?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is noticeably better than the Realme C61 — the overall rating gap is 19 points.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and the Realme C61?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 38/100, the Realme C61 — 19/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold or the Realme C61?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold leads on camera score (31/100 vs 0/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold or the Realme C61?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold leads on performance (32/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold over the Realme C61?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is a better fit for everyday use. The Realme C61 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.