Fairphone 3+ vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
The Fairphone 3+ (2020) runs on the Snapdragon 632, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads — 71/100 vs 26/100 (a 45-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3040); the main camera is 48 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is faster in AnTuTu (1,294,871 vs 243,691); the Fairphone 3+ is noticeably lighter (189g vs 204g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Fairphone 3+
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
What makes Fairphone 3+ better?
- Lighter: 189g vs 204g
- Overall rating 26/100
What makes ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 1294871 vs 243691
- Better Geekbench Single: 1662 vs 295
- Better Geekbench Multi: 4188 vs 1037
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3040 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (68/100 vs 18/100)
- Better camera (86/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (80/100 vs 44/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 50/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Fairphone 3+ vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition scores 45 points higher (71/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (68/100 vs 18/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (86/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (56/100 vs 15/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (68/100 vs 18/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (80/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (86/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (56/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition and the Fairphone 3+ are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Fairphone 3+ | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 632 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 243691 | 1294871 | |
| Geekbench Single | 295 | 1662 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1037 | 4188 | |
| Display | 5.7" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2160 | 1116x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3040 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB / 18GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 158.0×71.8×9.9 mm | 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 204 g | |
| Launch price | $489 | — |
Camera comparison
Fairphone 3+
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Main: 64MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Fairphone 3+
- 5.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2160
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1116x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Fairphone 3+
- 3040 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- Wireless charging: no data
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Fairphone 3+ and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads Fairphone 3+ by 81.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (68/100 vs 18/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (80/100 vs 44/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (86/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (56/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition and the Fairphone 3+ are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Fairphone 3+ or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ by 45 points (71/100 vs 26/100).
What is the rating of the Fairphone 3+ and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Fairphone 3+ has a MobileRank rating of 26/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Fairphone 3+ or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on camera score (86/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Fairphone 3+ or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on performance (68/100 vs 18/100).
Should you choose the Fairphone 3+ over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.