Fairphone 3+ vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Comparing the Fairphone 3+ (2020) and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads — 37/100 vs 13/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP.
Fairphone 3+
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Better design/ergonomics (63/100 vs 50/100)
- Better value for money (76/100 vs 55/100)
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Better camera (81/100 vs 26/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Fairphone 3+ vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim scores 24 points higher (37/100 vs 13/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (81/100 vs 26/100). In the "value for money" category, the Fairphone 3+ leads (76/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (81/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "design" category, the Fairphone 3+ is a bit better (63/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the Fairphone 3+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (76/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Fairphone 3+ | Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 632 | — | |
| AnTuTu | 243691 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 295 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1037 | — | |
| Display | 5.7" IPS LCD | 6.7" OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2160 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3040 mAh | — | |
| Charging | 18W | — | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 15, One UI 7 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 158.0×71.8×9.9 mm | — | |
| Weight | 189 g | — | |
| Price | $489 | — |
Fairphone 3+
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Fairphone 3+
- 5.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2160
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Fairphone 3+
- 3040 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- —
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (81/100 vs 26/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
design
In the "design" category, the Fairphone 3+ is a bit better (63/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Fairphone 3+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (76/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Fairphone 3+ or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ by 24 points (37/100 vs 13/100).
What is the rating of the Fairphone 3+ and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Fairphone 3+ has a MobileRank rating of 13/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim — 37/100.
Which has the better camera: the Fairphone 3+ or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads on camera score (81/100 vs 26/100).
Should you choose the Fairphone 3+ over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Fairphone 3+ is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts.