Coolpad Cool X Wide vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra
The Coolpad Cool X Wide (2026) runs on the Helio G99, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 38/100 (a 51-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4600); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,667,711 vs 554,590); the Coolpad Cool X Wide is noticeably lighter (209g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Coolpad Cool X Wide
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
What makes Coolpad Cool X Wide better?
- Lighter: 209g vs 226g
- Better portability (42/100 vs 40/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3667711 vs 554590
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 727
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2047
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4600 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 18W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (97/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 34/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 43/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Coolpad Cool X Wide vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra scores 51 points higher (89/100 vs 38/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (97/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Coolpad Cool X Wide (97/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Coolpad Cool X Wide (89/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Coolpad Cool X Wide (93/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Coolpad Cool X Wide (80/100 vs 34/100). In the "portability" category, the Coolpad Cool X Wide and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra are nearly equal (42/100 vs 40/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Coolpad Cool X Wide | Xiaomi 17 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Helio G99 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 554590 | 3667711 | |
| Geekbench Single | 727 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2047 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.4" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1158 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4600 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 166 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 150.3×94.5×9.0 mm | 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 209 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $999 |
Camera comparison
Coolpad Cool X Wide
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.63
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Coolpad Cool X Wide
- 6.4" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1158
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Coolpad Cool X Wide
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 16:09 hrs, total 33:23 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Coolpad Cool X Wide and Xiaomi 17 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads Coolpad Cool X Wide by 84.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Coolpad Cool X Wide
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Coolpad Cool X Wide (97/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Coolpad Cool X Wide (89/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Coolpad Cool X Wide (93/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Coolpad Cool X Wide (80/100 vs 34/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Coolpad Cool X Wide and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra are nearly equal (42/100 vs 40/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Coolpad Cool X Wide or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Coolpad Cool X Wide by 51 points (89/100 vs 38/100).
What is the rating of the Coolpad Cool X Wide and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Coolpad Cool X Wide has a MobileRank rating of 38/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Coolpad Cool X Wide or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Coolpad Cool X Wide or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Coolpad Cool X Wide over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.