ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL vs Vivo iQOO 13

The ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL (2017) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 835, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $599 and $650. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 31/100 (a 53-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 3600); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,150,555 vs 438,016); the ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL is noticeably lighter (175g vs 207g).

The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL by 53 points (84/100 vs 31/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL

Performance 33
Display 56
Camera 17
Battery 13
Portability 78
Value for money 0

Vivo iQOO 13

Performance 91
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 73
Portability 55
Value for money 82

What makes ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL better?

  • Lighter: 175g vs 207g
  • Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $650

  • Better portability (78/100 vs 55/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3150555 vs 438016
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 427
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 1500
  • Bigger battery: 6150 vs 3600 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 33/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 17/100)
  • Longer battery life (73/100 vs 13/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 56/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 53 points higher (84/100 vs 31/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (91/100 vs 33/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 17/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 13/100). Value score: ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL — 0/100, Vivo iQOO 13 — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL (91/100 vs 33/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL (99/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL (78/100 vs 17/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL (73/100 vs 13/100). In the "portability" category, the ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (78/100 vs 55/100).

Vivo iQOO 13: The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL Vivo iQOO 13
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 438016 3150555
Geekbench Single 427 3013
Geekbench Multi 1500 9287
Display 5.5" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x1920 1440x3168
Refresh rate 60 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 3600 mAh 6150 mAh
Charging 18W 120W
Main camera 12 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 16 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 6GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 64GB / 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 7.1.1 Nougat Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China)
NFC yes yes
Protection — IP68
Dimensions 156.9×75.6×7.6 mm 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm
Weight 175 g 207 g
Launch price $599 $650

Camera comparison

ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL

  • Main: 12MP f/1.7
  • Telephoto: 16MP
  • Front: 8MP
17
camera

Vivo iQOO 13

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL

  • 5.5" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x1920
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
56
display

Vivo iQOO 13

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL

  • 3600 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
13
battery

Vivo iQOO 13

  • 6150 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
73
battery

Overall performance score

We compared ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
31/100
438016 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
84/100 +86.1%
3150555 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 13 leads ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL by 86.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL

$599

Vivo iQOO 13

$650

Launch price difference: $51. ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL was $51 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL (91/100 vs 33/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL (99/100 vs 56/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL (78/100 vs 17/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL (73/100 vs 13/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (78/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL by 53 points (84/100 vs 31/100).

What is the rating of the ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL and the Vivo iQOO 13?

The ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL has a MobileRank rating of 31/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.

Which has the better camera: the ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 17/100).

Which is more powerful: the ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (91/100 vs 33/100).

Should you choose the ASUS Zenfone 4 Pro ZS551KL over the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.