ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL vs Vivo X300 Pro

The ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $899 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 52/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 859,084); the Vivo X300 Pro is thinner (8.0mm vs 9.5mm).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL by 36 points (88/100 vs 52/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL

Performance 55
Display 79
Camera 39
Battery 53
Portability 20
Value for money 16

Vivo X300 Pro

Performance 94
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 88

What makes ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL better?


  • Overall rating 52/100

What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 859084
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1031
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 2864
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 6000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 30W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
  • Lighter: 226g vs 240g

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 39/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 53/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 79/100)
  • Better portability (43/100 vs 20/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 36 points higher (88/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 53/100). Value score: ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL — 16/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL (94/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL (96/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL (81/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL (43/100 vs 20/100).

Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 859084 3326259
Geekbench Single 1031 3293
Geekbench Multi 2864 10243
Display 6.6" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2340 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 30W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 171
Main camera 48 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 24 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 9.0 / ROG UI Android 16
Brightness (peak) — 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection — IP68
Dimensions 171.0×77.6×9.5 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 240 g 226 g
Launch price $899 $899

Camera comparison

ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL

  • Main: 48MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 24MP
39
camera

Vivo X300 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL

  • 6.6" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Battery and charging

ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • No wireless charging
53
battery

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery

Overall performance score

We compared ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+
52/100
859084 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
88/100 +74.2%
3326259 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL by 74.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL

$899

Vivo X300 Pro

$899

Launch price difference: $0. Same launch price.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL (94/100 vs 55/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL (96/100 vs 39/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL (81/100 vs 53/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL (43/100 vs 20/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL by 36 points (88/100 vs 52/100).

What is the rating of the ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL has a MobileRank rating of 52/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 39/100).

Which is more powerful: the ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 55/100).

Should you choose the ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.