ASUS ROG Phone II vs Redmi Turbo 5
The ASUS ROG Phone II (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+, while the Redmi Turbo 5 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads — 67/100 vs 57/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 has the bigger battery (7560 mAh vs 6000); the Redmi Turbo 5 is faster in AnTuTu (2,809,170 vs 859,084); the Redmi Turbo 5 is noticeably lighter (204g vs 240g).
ASUS ROG Phone II
Redmi Turbo 5
- Overall rating 57/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 2809170 vs 859084
- Better Geekbench Single: 1553 vs 1031
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6403 vs 2864
- Bigger battery: 7560 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 30W
- Lighter: 204g vs 240g
- Higher performance (80/100 vs 55/100)
- Longer battery life (74/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 20/100)
Comparing the ASUS ROG Phone II vs the Redmi Turbo 5, the Redmi Turbo 5 scores 10 points higher (67/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (80/100 vs 55/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (74/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone II (80/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (85/100 vs 79/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone II (74/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone II (55/100 vs 20/100).
| Specification | ASUS ROG Phone II | Redmi Turbo 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra | |
| AnTuTu | 859084 | 2809170 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1031 | 1553 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2864 | 6403 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 2756x1268 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 7560 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 100W | |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 24 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), ROG UI | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.0×77.6×9.5 mm | 157.5×75.2×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 240 g | 204 g | |
| Launch price | — | $250 |
ASUS ROG Phone II
- Main: —
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Front: 24MP
Redmi Turbo 5
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
ASUS ROG Phone II
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Turbo 5
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2756x1268
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ASUS ROG Phone II
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- No wireless charging
Redmi Turbo 5
- 7560 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
We compared ASUS ROG Phone II and Redmi Turbo 5, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi Turbo 5 leads ASUS ROG Phone II by 69.4% in our overall performance rating.
ASUS ROG Phone II
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone II (80/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (85/100 vs 79/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone II (74/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone II (55/100 vs 20/100).
Which is better: the ASUS ROG Phone II or the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Redmi Turbo 5 is noticeably better than the ASUS ROG Phone II — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the ASUS ROG Phone II and the Redmi Turbo 5?
The ASUS ROG Phone II has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Redmi Turbo 5 — 67/100.
Which is more powerful: the ASUS ROG Phone II or the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Redmi Turbo 5 leads on performance (80/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the ASUS ROG Phone II over the Redmi Turbo 5?
The ASUS ROG Phone II is a better fit for everyday use. The Redmi Turbo 5 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.