ASUS ROG Phone 9 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3

The ASUS ROG Phone 9 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888; launch prices were $999 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the ASUS ROG Phone 9 leads — 71/100 vs 47/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the ASUS ROG Phone 9 has the bigger battery (5800 mAh vs 3300); the main camera is 50 MP vs 12 MP; the ASUS ROG Phone 9 is faster in AnTuTu (3,136,217 vs 1,135,878); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 is noticeably lighter (183g vs 227g).

The ASUS ROG Phone 9 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 by 24 points (71/100 vs 47/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

ASUS ROG Phone 9

Performance 92
Display 89
Camera 42
Battery 67
Portability 33
Value for money 52

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3

Performance 64
Display 82
Camera 16
Battery 19
Portability 76
Value for money 4

What makes ASUS ROG Phone 9 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3136217 vs 1135878
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 1500
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9900 vs 3537
  • Bigger battery: 5800 vs 3300 mAh
  • Faster charging: 65W vs 15W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 185Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 15W vs 10W

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 64/100)
  • Better camera (42/100 vs 16/100)
  • Longer battery life (67/100 vs 19/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 82/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 better?

  • Lighter: 183g vs 227g

  • Better portability (76/100 vs 33/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the ASUS ROG Phone 9 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3, the ASUS ROG Phone 9 scores 24 points higher (71/100 vs 47/100). In the "performance" category, the ASUS ROG Phone 9 leads (92/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the ASUS ROG Phone 9 leads (42/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, the ASUS ROG Phone 9 leads (67/100 vs 19/100). Value score: ASUS ROG Phone 9 — 52/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 — 4/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the ASUS ROG Phone 9 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 (92/100 vs 64/100). In the "display" category, the ASUS ROG Phone 9 is a bit better (89/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the ASUS ROG Phone 9 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 (42/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, the ASUS ROG Phone 9 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 (67/100 vs 19/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone 9 (76/100 vs 33/100).

ASUS ROG Phone 9: The ASUS ROG Phone 9 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3: The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification ASUS ROG Phone 9 Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
AnTuTu 3136217 1135878
Geekbench Single 3100 1500
Geekbench Multi 9900 3537
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 2400x1080 2640x1080
Refresh rate 185 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5800 mAh 3300 mAh
Charging 65W 15W
Wireless charging 15W 10W
Main camera 50 MP 12 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 12 MP
Front camera 32 MP 10 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB / 24GB 8GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 15 / ROG UI Android 11
Brightness (peak) 2500 nits —
NFC yes —
Protection IP68 —
Dimensions 163.8×76.8×8.9 mm —
Weight 227 g 183 g
Launch price $999 $999

Camera comparison

ASUS ROG Phone 9

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 32MP
42
camera

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3

  • Main: 12MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
16
camera

Display comparison

ASUS ROG Phone 9

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 185 Hz
89
display

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3

  • 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2640x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display

Battery and charging

ASUS ROG Phone 9

  • 5800 mAh
  • Wired: 65W
  • Wireless: 15W
67
battery

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3

  • 3300 mAh
  • Wired: 15W
  • Wireless: 10W
19
battery

Overall performance score

We compared ASUS ROG Phone 9 and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ASUS ROG Phone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
71/100
3136217 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
47/100 -176.1%
1135878 AnTuTu

ASUS ROG Phone 9 leads Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 by 176.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

ASUS ROG Phone 9

$999

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3

$999

Launch price difference: $0. Same launch price.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the ASUS ROG Phone 9 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 (92/100 vs 64/100).

display

In the "display" category, the ASUS ROG Phone 9 is a bit better (89/100 vs 82/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the ASUS ROG Phone 9 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 (42/100 vs 16/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the ASUS ROG Phone 9 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 (67/100 vs 19/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone 9 (76/100 vs 33/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the ASUS ROG Phone 9 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3?

The ASUS ROG Phone 9 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 by 24 points (71/100 vs 47/100).

What is the rating of the ASUS ROG Phone 9 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3?

The ASUS ROG Phone 9 has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 — 47/100.

Which has the better camera: the ASUS ROG Phone 9 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3?

The ASUS ROG Phone 9 leads on camera score (42/100 vs 16/100).

Which is more powerful: the ASUS ROG Phone 9 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3?

The ASUS ROG Phone 9 leads on performance (92/100 vs 64/100).

Should you choose the ASUS ROG Phone 9 over the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3?

The ASUS ROG Phone 9 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 is a better fit for active users.