ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro vs Nothing Phone (3a)

The ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Nothing Phone (3a) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; estimated prices are $1376 and $329. By overall MobileRank rating, the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro leads — 63/100 vs 42/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro has the bigger battery (5800 mAh vs 5000); the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,290,813 vs 1,044,507); the Nothing Phone (3a) is noticeably lighter (201g vs 227g).

The ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) by 21 points (63/100 vs 42/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro
Performance 75
Display 100
Camera 52
Battery 58
Design 16
Value for money 15
Nothing Phone (3a)
Performance 7
Display 100
Camera 58
Battery 42
Design 48
Value for money 87
What makes ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3290813 vs 1044507
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3211 vs 1162
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10106 vs 3315
  • Bigger battery: 5800 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 65W vs 45W
  • Higher refresh rate: 185Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (75/100 vs 7/100)
  • Longer battery life (58/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Nothing Phone (3a) better?
  • Lighter: 201g vs 227g
  • Cheaper: $329 vs $1376

  • Better camera (58/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (48/100 vs 16/100)
  • Better value for money (87/100 vs 15/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro vs the Nothing Phone (3a), the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro scores 21 points higher (63/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro leads (75/100 vs 7/100). In the "battery" category, the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro leads (58/100 vs 42/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) leads (87/100 vs 15/100). In the "performance" category, the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (75/100 vs 7/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) is a bit better (58/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (58/100 vs 42/100). In the "design" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro (48/100 vs 16/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro (87/100 vs 15/100).

ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro: The ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro is a better fit for active users.
Nothing Phone (3a): The Nothing Phone (3a) is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro Nothing Phone (3a)
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
AnTuTu 3290813 1044507
Geekbench Single 3211 1162
Geekbench Multi 10106 3315
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2400x1080 2392x1080
Refresh rate 185 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5800 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 65W 45W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 32 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 16GB / 24GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 15 / ROG UI Android 15 / Nothing OS 3.1
Brightness (peak) 2500 nits 3000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP54
Dimensions 163.8×76.8×8.9 mm 163.5×77.5×8.4 mm
Weight 227 g 201 g
Price $1376 $329
Camera comparison
ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Telephoto: 32MP
  • Front: 32MP
52
camera
Nothing Phone (3a)
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
58
camera
Display comparison
ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 185 Hz
100
display
Nothing Phone (3a)
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2392x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro
  • 5800 mAh
  • Wired: 65W
  • Wireless: 15W
58
battery
Nothing Phone (3a)
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
42
battery
Overall performance score

We compared ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro and Nothing Phone (3a), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
63/100
3290813 AnTuTu
Nothing Phone (3a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
42/100 -215.1%
1044507 AnTuTu

ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro leads Nothing Phone (3a) by 215.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro
$1376
Nothing Phone (3a)
$329

Price difference: $1047. Nothing Phone (3a) is cheaper by $1047.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (75/100 vs 7/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) is a bit better (58/100 vs 52/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (58/100 vs 42/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro (48/100 vs 16/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro (87/100 vs 15/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro or the Nothing Phone (3a)?

The ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) by 21 points (63/100 vs 42/100).

What is the rating of the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro and the Nothing Phone (3a)?

The ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 63/100, the Nothing Phone (3a) — 42/100.

Which has the better camera: the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro or the Nothing Phone (3a)?

The Nothing Phone (3a) leads on camera score (58/100 vs 52/100).

Which is more powerful: the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro or the Nothing Phone (3a)?

The ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro leads on performance (75/100 vs 7/100).

Should you choose the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro over the Nothing Phone (3a)?

The ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Nothing Phone (3a) is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.