ASUS ROG Phone 7 Ultimate vs Vivo iQOO 16

The ASUS ROG Phone 7 Ultimate (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6; launch prices were $1399 and $840. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 63/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 6000); the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 1,899,814); the Vivo iQOO 16 is noticeably lighter (223g vs 239g).

The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone 7 Ultimate by 26 points (89/100 vs 63/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

ASUS ROG Phone 7 Ultimate

Performance 76
Display 89
Camera 42
Battery 60
Portability 20
Value for money 36

Vivo iQOO 16

Performance 100
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 90
Portability 42
Value for money 92

What makes ASUS ROG Phone 7 Ultimate better?


  • Overall rating 63/100

What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 1899814
  • Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 2004
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 5311
  • Bigger battery: 8400 vs 6000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 65W
  • Lighter: 223g vs 239g
  • Cheaper at launch: $840 vs $1399

  • Higher performance (100/100 vs 76/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 42/100)
  • Longer battery life (90/100 vs 60/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 89/100)
  • Better portability (42/100 vs 20/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the ASUS ROG Phone 7 Ultimate vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 26 points higher (89/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 60/100). Value score: ASUS ROG Phone 7 Ultimate — 36/100, Vivo iQOO 16 — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone 7 Ultimate (100/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone 7 Ultimate (78/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone 7 Ultimate (90/100 vs 60/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone 7 Ultimate (42/100 vs 20/100).

ASUS ROG Phone 7 Ultimate: The ASUS ROG Phone 7 Ultimate is a better fit for active users.
Vivo iQOO 16: The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification ASUS ROG Phone 7 Ultimate Vivo iQOO 16
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6
AnTuTu 1899814 5498720
Geekbench Single 2004 4327
Geekbench Multi 5311 12873
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2448x1080 1440x3168
Refresh rate 165 Hz 165 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 8400 mAh
Charging 65W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 13 / ROG UI Android 17
Brightness (peak) 1500 nits 6000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP54 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 173.0×77.0×10.3 mm 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm
Weight 239 g 223 g
Launch price $1399 $840

Camera comparison

ASUS ROG Phone 7 Ultimate

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 32MP
42
camera

Vivo iQOO 16

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

ASUS ROG Phone 7 Ultimate

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2448x1080
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
89
display

Vivo iQOO 16

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

ASUS ROG Phone 7 Ultimate

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 65W
  • No wireless charging
60
battery

Vivo iQOO 16

  • 8400 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
90
battery

Overall performance score

We compared ASUS ROG Phone 7 Ultimate and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ASUS ROG Phone 7 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
63/100
1899814 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6
89/100 +65.4%
5498720 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 16 leads ASUS ROG Phone 7 Ultimate by 65.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

ASUS ROG Phone 7 Ultimate

$1399

Vivo iQOO 16

$840

Launch price difference: $559. Vivo iQOO 16 was $559 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone 7 Ultimate (100/100 vs 76/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone 7 Ultimate (78/100 vs 42/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone 7 Ultimate (90/100 vs 60/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone 7 Ultimate (42/100 vs 20/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the ASUS ROG Phone 7 Ultimate or the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone 7 Ultimate by 26 points (89/100 vs 63/100).

What is the rating of the ASUS ROG Phone 7 Ultimate and the Vivo iQOO 16?

The ASUS ROG Phone 7 Ultimate has a MobileRank rating of 63/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the ASUS ROG Phone 7 Ultimate or the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 42/100).

Which is more powerful: the ASUS ROG Phone 7 Ultimate or the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 76/100).

Should you choose the ASUS ROG Phone 7 Ultimate over the Vivo iQOO 16?

The ASUS ROG Phone 7 Ultimate is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.