ASUS ROG Phone 5 vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

The ASUS ROG Phone 5 (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $799 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 61/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 1,227,639); the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is thinner (8.7mm vs 10.3mm).

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone 5 by 28 points (89/100 vs 61/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

ASUS ROG Phone 5

Performance 65
Display 89
Camera 48
Battery 60
Portability 20
Value for money 36

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 92
Portability 35
Value for money 92

What makes ASUS ROG Phone 5 better?

  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP

  • Overall rating 61/100

What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 1227639
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1500
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 3537
  • Bigger battery: 7400 vs 6000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 65W
  • Lighter: 227g vs 238g

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 65/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 48/100)
  • Longer battery life (92/100 vs 60/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 89/100)
  • Better portability (35/100 vs 20/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the ASUS ROG Phone 5 vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 28 points higher (89/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 65/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 60/100). Value score: ASUS ROG Phone 5 — 36/100, Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone 5 (99/100 vs 65/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone 5 (78/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone 5 (92/100 vs 60/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone 5 (35/100 vs 20/100).

ASUS ROG Phone 5: The ASUS ROG Phone 5 is a better fit for active users.
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification ASUS ROG Phone 5 Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1227639 4602290
Geekbench Single 1500 3639
Geekbench Multi 3537 11047
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2448x1080 1440x3168
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 7400 mAh
Charging 65W 120W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 64 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 24 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB / 24GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 11 / ROG UI Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1200 nits 8000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection — IP68
Dimensions 172.8×77.3×10.3 mm 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm
Weight 238 g 227 g
Launch price $799 $799

Camera comparison

ASUS ROG Phone 5

  • Main: 64MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 24MP
48
camera

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

ASUS ROG Phone 5

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2448x1080
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
89
display

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

ASUS ROG Phone 5

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 65W
  • No wireless charging
60
battery

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 7400 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
92
battery

Overall performance score

We compared ASUS ROG Phone 5 and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ASUS ROG Phone 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
61/100
1227639 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100 +73.3%
4602290 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads ASUS ROG Phone 5 by 73.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

ASUS ROG Phone 5

$799

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

$799

Launch price difference: $0. Same launch price.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone 5 (99/100 vs 65/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone 5 (78/100 vs 48/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone 5 (92/100 vs 60/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone 5 (35/100 vs 20/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the ASUS ROG Phone 5 or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone 5 by 28 points (89/100 vs 61/100).

What is the rating of the ASUS ROG Phone 5 and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The ASUS ROG Phone 5 has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the ASUS ROG Phone 5 or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 48/100).

Which is more powerful: the ASUS ROG Phone 5 or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 65/100).

Should you choose the ASUS ROG Phone 5 over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The ASUS ROG Phone 5 is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.