ASUS 8z vs Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
The ASUS 8z (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888, while the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7200. Both devices score the same overall rating of 54/100. Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro has the bigger battery (4600 mAh vs 4000); the ASUS 8z is faster in AnTuTu (1,135,878 vs 971,424); the ASUS 8z has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro doesn't; the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro is thinner (7.4mm vs 8.9mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
ASUS 8z
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
What makes ASUS 8z better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 1135878 vs 971424
- Better Geekbench Single: 1500 vs 1167
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3537 vs 2577
- Lighter: 169g vs 175g
- Higher performance (64/100 vs 57/100)
- Better camera (43/100 vs 40/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 4600 vs 4000 mAh
- Longer battery life (44/100 vs 25/100)
- Better portability (80/100 vs 68/100)
Comparison verdict
The ASUS 8z and the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro received the same MobileRank rating — 54/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro leads (44/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, the ASUS 8z is a bit better (64/100 vs 57/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 79/100. In the "camera" category, the ASUS 8z and the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro are nearly equal (43/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro notably outperforms the ASUS 8z (44/100 vs 25/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro is a bit better (80/100 vs 68/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | ASUS 8z | Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 | |
| AnTuTu | 1135878 | 971424 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1500 | 1167 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3537 | 2577 | |
| Display | 5.9" | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2448 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 4600 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 66W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | — | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14, Funtouch 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 148.0×68.5×8.9 mm | 164.1×74.8×7.4 mm | |
| Weight | 169 g | 175 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
ASUS 8z
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 12MP
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- Main: 64MP f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
ASUS 8z
- 5.9"
- Resolution: 1080x2448
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
ASUS 8z
- 4000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared ASUS 8z and Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ASUS 8z leads Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro by 16.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the ASUS 8z is a bit better (64/100 vs 57/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 79/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the ASUS 8z and the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro are nearly equal (43/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro notably outperforms the ASUS 8z (44/100 vs 25/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro is a bit better (80/100 vs 68/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the ASUS 8z or the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?
Both devices scored 54/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the ASUS 8z (64/100 vs 57/100).
What is the rating of the ASUS 8z and the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?
The ASUS 8z has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro — 54/100.
Which is more powerful: the ASUS 8z or the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?
The ASUS 8z leads on performance (64/100 vs 57/100).
Should you choose the ASUS 8z over the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?
The ASUS 8z is a better fit for active users.