Apple iPhone Fold vs Vivo S50 Pro mini
The Apple iPhone Fold (2026) runs on the Apple A19 Pro, while the Vivo S50 Pro mini (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo S50 Pro mini leads — 79/100 vs 77/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo S50 Pro mini is faster in AnTuTu (2,974,201 vs 2,538,751).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone Fold
Vivo S50 Pro mini
What makes Apple iPhone Fold better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3970 vs 2833
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10558 vs 9119
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 90/100)
What makes Vivo S50 Pro mini better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2974201 vs 2538751
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Better camera (64/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 82/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Apple iPhone Fold vs the Vivo S50 Pro mini, the Vivo S50 Pro mini scores 2 points higher (79/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini leads (64/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Fold and the Vivo S50 Pro mini are nearly equal (92/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini and the Apple iPhone Fold are nearly equal (85/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini is a bit better (64/100 vs 53/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Apple iPhone Fold | Vivo S50 Pro mini | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A19 Pro | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2538751 | 2974201 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3970 | 2833 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10558 | 9119 | |
| Display | 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED | 6.3" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1920x2713 | 1216x2640 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | — | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 4 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | iOS 19 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | — | 150.8×71.8×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | — | 191 g | |
| Launch price | — | $485 |
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone Fold
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 4MP
Vivo S50 Pro mini
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Apple iPhone Fold
- 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1920x2713
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo S50 Pro mini
- 6.3" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone Fold
- —
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo S50 Pro mini
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Apple iPhone Fold and Vivo S50 Pro mini, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo S50 Pro mini leads Apple iPhone Fold by 14.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Apple iPhone Fold
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Fold and the Vivo S50 Pro mini are nearly equal (92/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini and the Apple iPhone Fold are nearly equal (85/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini is a bit better (64/100 vs 53/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Vivo S50 Pro mini?
The Vivo S50 Pro mini edges out the Apple iPhone Fold by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone Fold and the Vivo S50 Pro mini?
The Apple iPhone Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Vivo S50 Pro mini — 79/100.
Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Vivo S50 Pro mini?
The Vivo S50 Pro mini leads on camera score (64/100 vs 53/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone Fold over the Vivo S50 Pro mini?
The Apple iPhone Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo S50 Pro mini is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.