Apple iPhone Fold vs Vivo iQOO 13
The Apple iPhone Fold (2026) runs on the Apple A19 Pro, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 77/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,150,555 vs 2,538,751).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone Fold
Vivo iQOO 13
What makes Apple iPhone Fold better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3970 vs 3013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10558 vs 9287
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 91/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3150555 vs 2538751
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Better camera (78/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 82/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Apple iPhone Fold vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 7 points higher (84/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Fold and the Vivo iQOO 13 are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Apple iPhone Fold (99/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Apple iPhone Fold (78/100 vs 53/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Apple iPhone Fold | Vivo iQOO 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A19 Pro | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2538751 | 3150555 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3970 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10558 | 9287 | |
| Display | 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1920x2713 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | — | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 120W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 4 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | iOS 19 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | — | 207 g | |
| Launch price | — | $650 |
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone Fold
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 4MP
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Apple iPhone Fold
- 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1920x2713
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone Fold
- —
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Apple iPhone Fold and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 13 leads Apple iPhone Fold by 19.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Apple iPhone Fold
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Fold and the Vivo iQOO 13 are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Apple iPhone Fold (99/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Apple iPhone Fold (78/100 vs 53/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 edges out the Apple iPhone Fold by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone Fold and the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Apple iPhone Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 53/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone Fold over the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Apple iPhone Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.