Apple iPhone Fold vs Oppo K14 Turbo Pro
The Apple iPhone Fold (2026) runs on the Apple A19 Pro, while the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s. By overall MobileRank rating, the Apple iPhone Fold leads — 77/100 vs 72/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,032,039 vs 2,538,751).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone Fold
Oppo K14 Turbo Pro
What makes Apple iPhone Fold better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3970 vs 2725
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10558 vs 8932
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 90/100)
- Better camera (53/100 vs 35/100)
What makes Oppo K14 Turbo Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3032039 vs 2538751
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Better display (94/100 vs 82/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Apple iPhone Fold vs the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro, the Apple iPhone Fold scores 5 points higher (77/100 vs 72/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone Fold leads (53/100 vs 35/100). In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Fold and the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro are nearly equal (92/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone Fold notably outperforms the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro (53/100 vs 35/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Apple iPhone Fold | Oppo K14 Turbo Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A19 Pro | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | |
| AnTuTu | 2538751 | 3032039 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3970 | 2725 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10558 | 8932 | |
| Display | 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1920x2713 | 1280x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | — | 8000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 100W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 4 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | iOS 19 | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 8.3×None×None mm | |
| Weight | — | 213 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone Fold
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 4MP
Oppo K14 Turbo Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Apple iPhone Fold
- 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1920x2713
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo K14 Turbo Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1280x2800
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone Fold
- —
- Wireless charging: no data
Oppo K14 Turbo Pro
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Apple iPhone Fold and Oppo K14 Turbo Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Oppo K14 Turbo Pro leads Apple iPhone Fold by 16.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Fold and the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro are nearly equal (92/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone Fold notably outperforms the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro (53/100 vs 35/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro?
The Apple iPhone Fold edges out the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone Fold and the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro?
The Apple iPhone Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro — 72/100.
Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro?
The Apple iPhone Fold leads on camera score (53/100 vs 35/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone Fold over the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro?
The Apple iPhone Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Oppo K14 Turbo Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.