Apple iPhone Fold vs Nothing Phone (2a)
The Apple iPhone Fold (2026) runs on the Apple A19 Pro, while the Nothing Phone (2a) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Pro. By overall MobileRank rating, the Apple iPhone Fold leads — 77/100 vs 59/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Apple iPhone Fold is faster in AnTuTu (2,538,751 vs 985,261).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone Fold
Nothing Phone (2a)
What makes Apple iPhone Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2538751 vs 985261
- Better Geekbench Single: 3970 vs 1100
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10558 vs 3000
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (82/100 vs 80/100)
What makes Nothing Phone (2a) better?
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Better camera (57/100 vs 53/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Apple iPhone Fold vs the Nothing Phone (2a), the Apple iPhone Fold scores 18 points higher (77/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Fold leads (92/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (92/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Apple iPhone Fold and the Nothing Phone (2a) are nearly equal (82/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (2a) and the Apple iPhone Fold are nearly equal (57/100 vs 53/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Apple iPhone Fold | Nothing Phone (2a) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A19 Pro | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Pro | |
| AnTuTu | 2538751 | 985261 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3970 | 1100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10558 | 3000 | |
| Display | 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1920x2713 | 2412x1084 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | — | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 45W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 4 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | iOS 19 | Android 14 / Nothing OS 2.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | — | 161.7×76.3×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | — | 190 g | |
| Launch price | — | $349 |
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone Fold
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 4MP
Nothing Phone (2a)
- Main: 50MP f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Apple iPhone Fold
- 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1920x2713
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nothing Phone (2a)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2412x1084
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone Fold
- —
- Wireless charging: no data
Nothing Phone (2a)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Apple iPhone Fold and Nothing Phone (2a), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Apple iPhone Fold leads Nothing Phone (2a) by 157.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Apple iPhone Fold
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (92/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Apple iPhone Fold and the Nothing Phone (2a) are nearly equal (82/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (2a) and the Apple iPhone Fold are nearly equal (57/100 vs 53/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Nothing Phone (2a)?
The Apple iPhone Fold is noticeably better than the Nothing Phone (2a) — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone Fold and the Nothing Phone (2a)?
The Apple iPhone Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Nothing Phone (2a) — 59/100.
Which is more powerful: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Nothing Phone (2a)?
The Apple iPhone Fold leads on performance (92/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone Fold over the Nothing Phone (2a)?
The Apple iPhone Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users.