Apple iPhone Fold vs Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
The Apple iPhone Fold (2026) runs on the Apple A19 Pro, while the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Apple iPhone Fold leads — 77/100 vs 76/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is faster in AnTuTu (3,126,402 vs 2,538,751).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone Fold
Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
What makes Apple iPhone Fold better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3970 vs 3013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10558 vs 9287
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 91/100)
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3126402 vs 2538751
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Better camera (60/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 82/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Apple iPhone Fold vs the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025, the Apple iPhone Fold scores 1 points higher (77/100 vs 76/100). In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Fold and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is a bit better (60/100 vs 53/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Apple iPhone Fold | Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A19 Pro | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2538751 | 3126402 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3970 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10558 | 9287 | |
| Display | 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1920x2713 | 1224x2912 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | — | 4700 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 68W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 30W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 4 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB | |
| OS | iOS 19 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | — | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | |
| Weight | — | 199 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone Fold
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 4MP
Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Apple iPhone Fold
- 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1920x2713
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone Fold
- —
- Wireless charging: no data
Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Overall performance score
We compared Apple iPhone Fold and Motorola Razr Ultra 2025, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 leads Apple iPhone Fold by 18.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Fold and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is a bit better (60/100 vs 53/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025?
The Apple iPhone Fold edges out the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone Fold and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025?
The Apple iPhone Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 — 76/100.
Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 53/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone Fold over the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025?
The Apple iPhone Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is a better fit for gamers and power users.