Apple iPhone 17e vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide

The Apple iPhone 17e (2026) runs on the Apple A19, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads — 71/100 vs 59/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide has the bigger battery (4800 mAh vs 3600); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 2,156,126); the Apple iPhone 17e is noticeably lighter (163g vs 199g).

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is noticeably better than the Apple iPhone 17e — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone 17e
Performance 89
Display 61
Camera 34
Battery 21
Portability 83
Value for money 30
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Performance 92
Display 81
Camera 50
Battery 45
Portability 76
Value for money
What makes Apple iPhone 17e better?
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3692 vs 3041
  • Lighter: 163g vs 199g

  • Better portability (83/100 vs 76/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 2156126
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 9454
  • Bigger battery: 4800 vs 3600 mAh
  • Faster charging: 45W vs 20W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 89/100)
  • Better camera (50/100 vs 34/100)
  • Longer battery life (45/100 vs 21/100)
  • Better display (81/100 vs 61/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Apple iPhone 17e vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide scores 12 points higher (71/100 vs 59/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (50/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (45/100 vs 21/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Apple iPhone 17e are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17e (81/100 vs 61/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17e (50/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17e (45/100 vs 21/100). In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 17e is a bit better (83/100 vs 76/100).

Apple iPhone 17e: The Apple iPhone 17e is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Specs comparison
Specification Apple iPhone 17e Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Processor Apple A19 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 2156126 3119308
Geekbench Single 3692 3041
Geekbench Multi 9454 9494
Display 6.1" OLED 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
Resolution 2556x1179 1828x2584
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 3600 mAh 4800 mAh
Charging 20W 45W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
Main camera 48 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 24 MP 10 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS iOS 19 Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8
Brightness (peak) 1200 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP48
Dimensions 146.7×71.5×7.8 mm 161.4×123.9×4.9 mm
Weight 163 g 199 g
Price $599
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone 17e
  • Main: 48MP f/1.6
  • Front: 24MP
34
camera
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
  • Main: 50MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 10MP
50
camera
Display comparison
Apple iPhone 17e
  • 6.1" OLED
  • Resolution: 2556x1179
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
61
display
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
  • 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
  • Resolution: 1828x2584
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone 17e
  • 3600 mAh
  • Wired: 20W
  • Wireless: 15W
21
battery
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
  • 4800 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
45
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Apple iPhone 17e and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Apple iPhone 17e Apple A19
59/100
2156126 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
71/100 +30.9%
3119308 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads Apple iPhone 17e by 30.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Apple iPhone 17e
$599
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Apple iPhone 17e are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17e (81/100 vs 61/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17e (50/100 vs 34/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17e (45/100 vs 21/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 17e is a bit better (83/100 vs 76/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone 17e or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is noticeably better than the Apple iPhone 17e — the overall rating gap is 12 points.

What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 17e and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Apple iPhone 17e has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — 71/100.

Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone 17e or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on camera score (50/100 vs 34/100).

Should you choose the Apple iPhone 17e over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Apple iPhone 17e is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.