Apple iPhone 17e vs Poco F8
The Apple iPhone 17e (2026) runs on the Apple A19, while the Poco F8 (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $665 and $499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F8 leads — 75/100 vs 59/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F8 has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 3600); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Poco F8 is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 2,156,126); the Apple iPhone 17e is noticeably lighter (163g vs 205g).
Apple iPhone 17e
Poco F8
- Better Geekbench Single: 3692 vs 3041
- Lighter: 163g vs 205g
- Better portability (83/100 vs 54/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 2156126
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 9454
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 3600 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Cheaper: $499 vs $665
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 89/100)
- Better camera (37/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (86/100 vs 21/100)
- Better display (90/100 vs 61/100)
Comparing the Apple iPhone 17e vs the Poco F8, the Poco F8 scores 16 points higher (75/100 vs 59/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 leads (86/100 vs 21/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 and the Apple iPhone 17e are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F8 notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17e (90/100 vs 61/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F8 and the Apple iPhone 17e are nearly equal (37/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 17e (86/100 vs 21/100). In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 17e notably outperforms the Poco F8 (83/100 vs 54/100).
| Specification | Apple iPhone 17e | Poco F8 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A19 | Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2156126 | 3119308 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3692 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9454 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.1" OLED | 6.6" OLED | |
| Resolution | 2556x1179 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3600 mAh | 8000 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | — | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 24 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | iOS 19 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 146.7×71.5×7.8 mm | — | |
| Weight | 163 g | 205 g | |
| Price | $665 | $499 |
Apple iPhone 17e
- Main: 48MP f/1.6
- Front: 24MP
Poco F8
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Apple iPhone 17e
- 6.1" OLED
- Resolution: 2556x1179
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Poco F8
- 6.6" OLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Apple iPhone 17e
- 3600 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- Wireless: 15W
Poco F8
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless charging: no data
We compared Apple iPhone 17e and Poco F8, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F8 leads Apple iPhone 17e by 30.9% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $166. Poco F8 is cheaper by $166.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 and the Apple iPhone 17e are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F8 notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17e (90/100 vs 61/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F8 and the Apple iPhone 17e are nearly equal (37/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 17e (86/100 vs 21/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 17e notably outperforms the Poco F8 (83/100 vs 54/100).
Which is better: the Apple iPhone 17e or the Poco F8?
The Poco F8 is noticeably better than the Apple iPhone 17e — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 17e and the Poco F8?
The Apple iPhone 17e has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the Poco F8 — 75/100.
Should you choose the Apple iPhone 17e over the Poco F8?
The Apple iPhone 17e is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Poco F8 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.