Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Redmi Turbo 5

The Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (2025) runs on the Apple A19 Pro, while the Redmi Turbo 5 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra; launch prices were $1199 and $250. By overall MobileRank rating, the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max leads — 75/100 vs 66/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 has the bigger battery (7560 mAh vs 4823); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max is faster in AnTuTu (2,538,751 vs 2,112,047); the Redmi Turbo 5 is noticeably lighter (204g vs 233g).

The Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max edges out the Redmi Turbo 5 by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max

Performance 92
Display 85
Camera 71
Battery 53
Portability 30
Value for money 60

Redmi Turbo 5

Performance 77
Display 85
Camera 37
Battery 74
Portability 55
Value for money 82

What makes Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 2538751 vs 2112047
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3933 vs 1555
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10223 vs 6405

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 77/100)
  • Better camera (71/100 vs 37/100)

What makes Redmi Turbo 5 better?

  • Bigger battery: 7560 vs 4823 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 40W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
  • Lighter: 204g vs 233g
  • Cheaper at launch: $250 vs $1199

  • Longer battery life (74/100 vs 53/100)
  • Better portability (55/100 vs 30/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs the Redmi Turbo 5, the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max scores 9 points higher (75/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max leads (92/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max leads (71/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (74/100 vs 53/100). Value score: Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max — 60/100, Redmi Turbo 5 — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (92/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 85/100. In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (71/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (74/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (55/100 vs 30/100).

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max: The Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Redmi Turbo 5: The Redmi Turbo 5 is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Redmi Turbo 5
Processor Apple A19 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra
AnTuTu 2538751 2112047
Geekbench Single 3933 1555
Geekbench Multi 10223 6405
Display 6.9" LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED 6.6" AMOLED
Resolution 2868x1320 2756x1268
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4823 mAh 7560 mAh
Charging 40W 100W
Wireless charging 25W 0W
Main camera 48 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 48 MP 0 MP
Front camera 18 MP 20 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB / 2TB 256GB / 512GB
OS iOS 26 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits 3500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 163.4×78.0×8.8 mm 157.5×75.2×8.2 mm
Weight 233 g 204 g
Launch price $1199 $250

Camera comparison

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max

  • Main: 48MP f/1.78
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Telephoto: 48MP
  • Front: 18MP
71
camera

Redmi Turbo 5

  • Main: 50MP f/1.5
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
37
camera

Display comparison

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max

  • 6.9" LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED
  • Resolution: 2868x1320
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display

Redmi Turbo 5

  • 6.6" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2756x1268
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display

Battery and charging

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max

  • 4823 mAh
  • Wired: 40W
  • Wireless: 25W
53
battery

Redmi Turbo 5

  • 7560 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
74
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max and Redmi Turbo 5, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro
75/100
2538751 AnTuTu
Redmi Turbo 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra
66/100 -20.2%
2112047 AnTuTu

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max leads Redmi Turbo 5 by 20.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max

$1199

Redmi Turbo 5

$250

Launch price difference: $949. Redmi Turbo 5 was $949 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (92/100 vs 77/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 85/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (71/100 vs 37/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (74/100 vs 53/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (55/100 vs 30/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max or the Redmi Turbo 5?

The Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max edges out the Redmi Turbo 5 by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max and the Redmi Turbo 5?

The Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Redmi Turbo 5 — 66/100.

Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max or the Redmi Turbo 5?

The Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max leads on camera score (71/100 vs 37/100).

Which is more powerful: the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max or the Redmi Turbo 5?

The Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max leads on performance (92/100 vs 77/100).

Should you choose the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max over the Redmi Turbo 5?

The Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Redmi Turbo 5 is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.