Apple iPhone 16e vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
The Apple iPhone 16e (2025) runs on the Apple A18, while the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $599 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads — 80/100 vs 56/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3279); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,128,552 vs 1,972,476); the Apple iPhone 16e is noticeably lighter (167g vs 218g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone 16e
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
What makes Apple iPhone 16e better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3254 vs 3100
- Lighter: 167g vs 218g
- Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $1299
- Better portability (80/100 vs 46/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3128552 vs 1972476
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9760 vs 8070
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3279 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 20W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 15W vs 7W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 85/100)
- Better camera (81/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 19/100)
- Better display (88/100 vs 61/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Apple iPhone 16e vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra scores 24 points higher (80/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (81/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (56/100 vs 19/100). Value score: Apple iPhone 16e — 26/100, Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 70/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (92/100 vs 85/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16e (88/100 vs 61/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16e (81/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16e (56/100 vs 19/100). In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 16e significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (80/100 vs 46/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Apple iPhone 16e | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A18 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1972476 | 3128552 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3254 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8070 | 9760 | |
| Display | 6.1" OLED | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2532x1170 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3279 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 20W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 7W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 151 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | iOS 18 | Android 15 / One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 146.7×71.5×7.8 mm | 162.8×77.6×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 167 g | 218 g | |
| Launch price | $599 | $1299 |
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone 16e
- Main: 48MP f/1.6
- Front: 12MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Display comparison
Apple iPhone 16e
- 6.1" OLED
- Resolution: 2532x1170
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone 16e
- 3279 mAh
- Wired: 20W
- Wireless: 7W
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:10 hrs, total 28:43 hrs
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Apple iPhone 16e and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads Apple iPhone 16e by 37.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $700. Apple iPhone 16e was $700 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (92/100 vs 85/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16e (88/100 vs 61/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16e (81/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16e (56/100 vs 19/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 16e significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (80/100 vs 46/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone 16e or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16e by 24 points (80/100 vs 56/100).
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 16e and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Apple iPhone 16e has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 80/100.
Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone 16e or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on camera score (81/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Apple iPhone 16e or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 85/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone 16e over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Apple iPhone 16e is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.