Apple iPhone 16e vs OPPO Find X8 Ultra

The Apple iPhone 16e (2025) runs on the Apple A18, while the OPPO Find X8 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $599 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Find X8 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 56/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Find X8 Ultra has the bigger battery (6100 mAh vs 3279); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Find X8 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,183,101 vs 1,972,476); the Apple iPhone 16e is noticeably lighter (167g vs 226g).

The OPPO Find X8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16e by 30 points (86/100 vs 56/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Apple iPhone 16e

Performance 85
Display 61
Camera 30
Battery 19
Portability 80
Value for money 26

OPPO Find X8 Ultra

Performance 91
Display 89
Camera 94
Battery 78
Portability 35
Value for money 82

What makes Apple iPhone 16e better?

  • Better Geekbench Single: 3254 vs 3013
  • Lighter: 167g vs 226g
  • Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $999

  • Better portability (80/100 vs 35/100)

What makes OPPO Find X8 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3183101 vs 1972476
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 8070
  • Bigger battery: 6100 vs 3279 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 20W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 7W

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 85/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (78/100 vs 19/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 61/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Apple iPhone 16e vs the OPPO Find X8 Ultra, the OPPO Find X8 Ultra scores 30 points higher (86/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X8 Ultra leads (94/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X8 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 19/100). Value score: Apple iPhone 16e — 26/100, OPPO Find X8 Ultra — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X8 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 85/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Find X8 Ultra notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16e (89/100 vs 61/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16e (94/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16e (78/100 vs 19/100). In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 16e significantly outperforms the OPPO Find X8 Ultra (80/100 vs 35/100).

Apple iPhone 16e: The Apple iPhone 16e is a better fit for gamers and power users.
OPPO Find X8 Ultra: The OPPO Find X8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Apple iPhone 16e OPPO Find X8 Ultra
Processor Apple A18 Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 1972476 3183101
Geekbench Single 3254 3013
Geekbench Multi 8070 9287
Display 6.1" OLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2532x1170 3168x1440
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 3279 mAh 6100 mAh
Charging 20W 80W
Wireless charging 7W 50W
DXOMark (camera) — 168
Main camera 48 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 12 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS iOS 18 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 1200 nits 2500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 146.7×71.5×7.8 mm 163.1×76.8×8.8 mm
Weight 167 g 226 g
Launch price $599 $999

Camera comparison

Apple iPhone 16e

  • Main: 48MP f/1.6
  • Front: 12MP
30
camera

OPPO Find X8 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
94
camera

Display comparison

Apple iPhone 16e

  • 6.1" OLED
  • Resolution: 2532x1170
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
61
display

OPPO Find X8 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Apple iPhone 16e

  • 3279 mAh
  • Wired: 20W
  • Wireless: 7W
19
battery

OPPO Find X8 Ultra

  • 6100 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:45 hrs, total 28:25 hrs
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
78
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Apple iPhone 16e and OPPO Find X8 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Apple iPhone 16e Apple A18
56/100
1972476 AnTuTu
OPPO Find X8 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Elite
86/100 +38.0%
3183101 AnTuTu

OPPO Find X8 Ultra leads Apple iPhone 16e by 38.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Apple iPhone 16e

$599

OPPO Find X8 Ultra

$999

Launch price difference: $400. Apple iPhone 16e was $400 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X8 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 85/100).

display

In the "display" category, the OPPO Find X8 Ultra notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16e (89/100 vs 61/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16e (94/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16e (78/100 vs 19/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 16e significantly outperforms the OPPO Find X8 Ultra (80/100 vs 35/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Apple iPhone 16e or the OPPO Find X8 Ultra?

The OPPO Find X8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16e by 30 points (86/100 vs 56/100).

What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 16e and the OPPO Find X8 Ultra?

The Apple iPhone 16e has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the OPPO Find X8 Ultra — 86/100.

Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone 16e or the OPPO Find X8 Ultra?

The OPPO Find X8 Ultra leads on camera score (94/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Apple iPhone 16e or the OPPO Find X8 Ultra?

The OPPO Find X8 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 85/100).

Should you choose the Apple iPhone 16e over the OPPO Find X8 Ultra?

The Apple iPhone 16e is a better fit for gamers and power users. The OPPO Find X8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.