Apple iPhone 16e vs Fairphone 3+

The Apple iPhone 16e (2025) runs on the Apple A18, while the Fairphone 3+ (2020) runs on the Snapdragon 632; launch prices were $599 and $489. By overall MobileRank rating, the Apple iPhone 16e leads — 56/100 vs 26/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Apple iPhone 16e has the bigger battery (3279 mAh vs 3040); the Apple iPhone 16e is faster in AnTuTu (1,972,476 vs 243,691); the Apple iPhone 16e is noticeably lighter (167g vs 189g).

The Apple iPhone 16e significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ by 30 points (56/100 vs 26/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Apple iPhone 16e

Performance 85
Display 61
Camera 30
Battery 19
Portability 80
Value for money 26

Fairphone 3+

Performance 18
Display 44
Camera 31
Battery 15
Portability 50
Value for money 0

What makes Apple iPhone 16e better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 1972476 vs 243691
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3254 vs 295
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 8070 vs 1037
  • Bigger battery: 3279 vs 3040 mAh
  • Faster charging: 20W vs 18W
  • Lighter: 167g vs 189g

  • Higher performance (85/100 vs 18/100)
  • Longer battery life (19/100 vs 15/100)
  • Better display (61/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better portability (80/100 vs 50/100)

What makes Fairphone 3+ better?

  • Cheaper at launch: $489 vs $599

  • Better camera (31/100 vs 30/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Apple iPhone 16e vs the Fairphone 3+, the Apple iPhone 16e scores 30 points higher (56/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone 16e leads (85/100 vs 18/100). Value score: Apple iPhone 16e — 26/100, Fairphone 3+ — 0/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone 16e significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (85/100 vs 18/100). In the "display" category, the Apple iPhone 16e notably outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (61/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Fairphone 3+ and the Apple iPhone 16e are nearly equal (31/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Apple iPhone 16e and the Fairphone 3+ are nearly equal (19/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 16e significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (80/100 vs 50/100).

Apple iPhone 16e: The Apple iPhone 16e is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Specs comparison

Specification Apple iPhone 16e Fairphone 3+
Processor Apple A18 Snapdragon 632
AnTuTu 1972476 243691
Geekbench Single 3254 295
Geekbench Multi 8070 1037
Display 6.1" OLED 5.7" IPS LCD
Resolution 2532x1170 1080x2160
Refresh rate 60 Hz 60 Hz
Battery 3279 mAh 3040 mAh
Charging 20W 18W
Wireless charging 7W —
Main camera 48 MP 48 MP
Front camera 12 MP 16 MP
RAM 8GB 4GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB 64GB
OS iOS 18 Android 10
Brightness (peak) 1200 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 —
Dimensions 146.7×71.5×7.8 mm 158.0×71.8×9.9 mm
Weight 167 g 189 g
Launch price $599 $489

Camera comparison

Apple iPhone 16e

  • Main: 48MP f/1.6
  • Front: 12MP
30
camera

Fairphone 3+

  • Main: 48MP f/1.8
  • Front: 16MP
31
camera

Display comparison

Apple iPhone 16e

  • 6.1" OLED
  • Resolution: 2532x1170
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
61
display

Fairphone 3+

  • 5.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2160
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
44
display

Battery and charging

Apple iPhone 16e

  • 3279 mAh
  • Wired: 20W
  • Wireless: 7W
19
battery

Fairphone 3+

  • 3040 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • Wireless charging: no data
15
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Apple iPhone 16e and Fairphone 3+, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Apple iPhone 16e Apple A18
56/100
1972476 AnTuTu
Fairphone 3+ Snapdragon 632
26/100 -709.4%
243691 AnTuTu

Apple iPhone 16e leads Fairphone 3+ by 709.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Apple iPhone 16e

$599

Fairphone 3+

$489

Launch price difference: $110. Fairphone 3+ was $110 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone 16e significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (85/100 vs 18/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Apple iPhone 16e notably outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (61/100 vs 44/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Fairphone 3+ and the Apple iPhone 16e are nearly equal (31/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Apple iPhone 16e and the Fairphone 3+ are nearly equal (19/100 vs 15/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 16e significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (80/100 vs 50/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Apple iPhone 16e or the Fairphone 3+?

The Apple iPhone 16e significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ by 30 points (56/100 vs 26/100).

What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 16e and the Fairphone 3+?

The Apple iPhone 16e has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Fairphone 3+ — 26/100.

Which is more powerful: the Apple iPhone 16e or the Fairphone 3+?

The Apple iPhone 16e leads on performance (85/100 vs 18/100).

Should you choose the Apple iPhone 16e over the Fairphone 3+?

The Apple iPhone 16e is a better fit for gamers and power users.