Apple iPhone 16 vs Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

The Apple iPhone 16 (2024) runs on the Apple A18, while the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (2024) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2400e; launch prices were $799 and $649. By overall MobileRank rating, the Apple iPhone 16 leads — 68/100 vs 67/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has the bigger battery (4700 mAh vs 3561); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Apple iPhone 16 is faster in AnTuTu (1,972,476 vs 1,849,346); per DXOMark lab testing, the Apple iPhone 16 has the stronger camera (147 vs 133); the Apple iPhone 16 is noticeably lighter (170g vs 213g).

The Apple iPhone 16 edges out the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Apple iPhone 16

Performance 84
Display 61
Camera 78
Battery 24
Portability 79
Value for money 50

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

Performance 76
Display 79
Camera 67
Battery 46
Portability 51
Value for money 48

What makes Apple iPhone 16 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 1972476 vs 1849346
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 1850
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 7700 vs 5500
  • Faster charging: 27W vs 25W
  • Faster wireless charging: 25W vs 15W
  • Lighter: 170g vs 213g

  • Higher performance (84/100 vs 76/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 67/100)
  • Better portability (79/100 vs 51/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy S24 FE better?

  • Bigger battery: 4700 vs 3561 mAh
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
  • Cheaper at launch: $649 vs $799

  • Longer battery life (46/100 vs 24/100)
  • Better display (79/100 vs 61/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Apple iPhone 16 vs the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, the Apple iPhone 16 scores 1 points higher (68/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 16 leads (78/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE leads (46/100 vs 24/100). Value score: Apple iPhone 16 — 50/100, Samsung Galaxy S24 FE — 48/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone 16 is a bit better (84/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 (79/100 vs 61/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 16 is a bit better (78/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 (46/100 vs 24/100). In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 16 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (79/100 vs 51/100).

Apple iPhone 16: The Apple iPhone 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE: The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Apple iPhone 16 Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Processor Apple A18 Samsung Exynos 2400e
AnTuTu 1972476 1849346
Geekbench Single 3100 1850
Geekbench Multi 7700 5500
Display 6.1" Super Retina XDR OLED 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 2556x1179 2340x1080
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 3561 mAh 4700 mAh
Charging 27W 25W
Wireless charging 25W 15W
DXOMark (camera) 147 133
Main camera 48 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 8 MP
Front camera 12 MP 10 MP
RAM 8GB 8GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB 128GB / 256GB
OS iOS 18 Android 14 / One UI 6.1
Brightness (peak) 2000 nits 1900 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 147.6×71.6×7.8 mm 162.0×77.3×8.0 mm
Weight 170 g 213 g
Launch price $799 $649

Camera comparison

Apple iPhone 16

  • Main: 48MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 12MP
78
camera

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 8MP
  • Front: 10MP
67
camera

Display comparison

Apple iPhone 16

  • 6.1" Super Retina XDR OLED
  • Resolution: 2556x1179
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
61
display

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

  • 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2340x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Battery and charging

Apple iPhone 16

  • 3561 mAh
  • Wired: 27W
  • Wireless: 25W
24
battery

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
46
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Apple iPhone 16 and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Apple iPhone 16 Apple A18
68/100
1972476 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e
67/100 -6.7%
1849346 AnTuTu

Apple iPhone 16 leads Samsung Galaxy S24 FE by 6.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Apple iPhone 16

$799

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

$649

Launch price difference: $150. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE was $150 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone 16 is a bit better (84/100 vs 76/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 (79/100 vs 61/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 16 is a bit better (78/100 vs 67/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 (46/100 vs 24/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 16 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (79/100 vs 51/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Apple iPhone 16 or the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE?

The Apple iPhone 16 edges out the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 16 and the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE?

The Apple iPhone 16 has a MobileRank rating of 68/100, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE — 67/100.

Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone 16 or the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE?

The Apple iPhone 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 67/100).

Which is more powerful: the Apple iPhone 16 or the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE?

The Apple iPhone 16 leads on performance (84/100 vs 76/100).

Should you choose the Apple iPhone 16 over the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE?

The Apple iPhone 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is a better fit for active users.