Apple iPhone 16 vs Poco F7

The Apple iPhone 16 (2024) runs on the Apple A18, while the Poco F7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4; estimated prices are $447 and $404. By overall MobileRank rating, the Apple iPhone 16 leads — 67/100 vs 66/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F7 has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 3561); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Poco F7 is faster in AnTuTu (2,205,289 vs 1,650,000); the Apple iPhone 16 is noticeably lighter (170g vs 215g).

The Apple iPhone 16 edges out the Poco F7 by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone 16
Performance 82
Display 61
Camera 78
Battery 24
Portability 79
Value for money 66
Poco F7
Performance 81
Display 83
Camera 37
Battery 68
Portability 48
Value for money 70
What makes Apple iPhone 16 better?
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 2070
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 7700 vs 6694
  • Lighter: 170g vs 215g

  • Higher performance (82/100 vs 81/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 37/100)
  • Better portability (79/100 vs 48/100)
What makes Poco F7 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 2205289 vs 1650000
  • Bigger battery: 6500 vs 3561 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 27W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
  • Cheaper: $404 vs $447

  • Longer battery life (68/100 vs 24/100)
  • Better display (83/100 vs 61/100)
  • Better value for money (70/100 vs 66/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Apple iPhone 16 vs the Poco F7, the Apple iPhone 16 scores 1 points higher (67/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 16 leads (78/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 leads (68/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone 16 and the Poco F7 are nearly equal (82/100 vs 81/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F7 notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 (83/100 vs 61/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 16 significantly outperforms the Poco F7 (78/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 (68/100 vs 24/100). In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 16 significantly outperforms the Poco F7 (79/100 vs 48/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco F7 and the Apple iPhone 16 are nearly equal (70/100 vs 66/100).

Apple iPhone 16: The Apple iPhone 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Poco F7: The Poco F7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Specs comparison
Specification Apple iPhone 16 Poco F7
Processor Apple A18 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
AnTuTu 1650000 2205289
Geekbench Single 3100 2070
Geekbench Multi 7700 6694
Display 6.1" Super Retina XDR OLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 2556x1179 2712x1220
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 3561 mAh 6500 mAh
Charging 27W 90W
Wireless charging 25W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 147
Main camera 48 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 8 MP
Front camera 12 MP 20 MP
RAM 8GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB
OS iOS 18 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 2000 nits 3200 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 147.6×71.6×7.8 mm 163.1×77.9×8.2 mm
Weight 170 g 215 g
Price $447 $404
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone 16
  • Main: 48MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 12MP
78
camera
Poco F7
  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
37
camera
Display comparison
Apple iPhone 16
  • 6.1" Super Retina XDR OLED
  • Resolution: 2556x1179
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
61
display
Poco F7
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2712x1220
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
83
display
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone 16
  • 3561 mAh
  • Wired: 27W
  • Wireless: 25W
24
battery
Poco F7
  • 6500 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • No wireless charging
68
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Apple iPhone 16 and Poco F7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Apple iPhone 16 Apple A18
67/100
1650000 AnTuTu
Poco F7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
66/100 +25.2%
2205289 AnTuTu

Poco F7 leads Apple iPhone 16 by 25.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Apple iPhone 16
$447
Poco F7
$404

Price difference: $43. Poco F7 is cheaper by $43.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone 16 and the Poco F7 are nearly equal (82/100 vs 81/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Poco F7 notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 (83/100 vs 61/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 16 significantly outperforms the Poco F7 (78/100 vs 37/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 (68/100 vs 24/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 16 significantly outperforms the Poco F7 (79/100 vs 48/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Poco F7 and the Apple iPhone 16 are nearly equal (70/100 vs 66/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone 16 or the Poco F7?

The Apple iPhone 16 edges out the Poco F7 by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 16 and the Poco F7?

The Apple iPhone 16 has a MobileRank rating of 67/100, the Poco F7 — 66/100.

Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone 16 or the Poco F7?

The Apple iPhone 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 37/100).

Should you choose the Apple iPhone 16 over the Poco F7?

The Apple iPhone 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Poco F7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.