This ranking covers the seven highest-placed camera phones in the provided MobileRank dataset, ordered by DXOMark camera score. MobileRank’s broader rating considers specifications and benchmark results, so each entry is assessed not only by camera performance but also by overall rating, AnTuTu performance, battery score, and estimated battery life.
1. Huawei Pura 80 Ultra
The Huawei Pura 80 Ultra leads this list with a DXOMark score of 175 and the maximum MobileRank camera score of 100. Its overall MobileRank rating is 78, while its performance rating of 68 and AnTuTu result of 1,395,526 are notably lower than those of several phones ranked below it. This makes the Pura 80 Ultra primarily attractive to buyers who place camera results above peak benchmark performance. Battery performance is comparatively strong, with a battery score of 81, a 5,700 mAh capacity, and an estimated 9.5 hours of use.
Key specs: DXOMark 175; MobileRank 78; camera score 100; AnTuTu 1,395,526; Kirin 9020; 6.8-inch LTPO OLED 120Hz display; 5,700 mAh battery; 100W charging; 50 MP main camera; 234 g. See details
2. Vivo X300 Pro
The Vivo X300 Pro follows with a DXOMark score of 171 and a MobileRank camera score of 96. Its overall rating of 87 is supported by a performance score of 93 and an AnTuTu result of 3,269,794, giving it a more balanced profile than the camera-focused Huawei. Battery figures are also substantial: the phone has a battery score of 81, a 6,510 mAh capacity, and an estimated runtime of 13 hours. NFC, IP68 protection, and 90W charging add practical value without changing its position in the camera ranking.
Key specs: DXOMark 171; MobileRank 87; camera score 96; AnTuTu 3,269,794; Dimensity 9500; 6.8-inch AMOLED 120Hz display; 6,510 mAh battery; 13-hour estimate; 90W charging; 200 MP main camera; NFC; IP68; 226 g. See details
3. Vivo X300 Ultra
The Vivo X300 Ultra records a DXOMark score of 170, only one point behind the X300 Pro. However, it has the highest overall MobileRank rating among the seven models at 91, together with a performance score of 99 and an AnTuTu result of 4,247,433. Its battery score of 85 is also the strongest in this group, supported by a 7,000 mAh battery and an estimated 14 hours of operation. These figures make it the most balanced option in the dataset for users who want a high camera score without giving up benchmark performance or battery endurance.
Key specs: DXOMark 170; MobileRank 91; camera score 96; AnTuTu 4,247,433; Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; 6.8-inch LTPO OLED 120Hz display; 7,000 mAh battery; 14-hour estimate; 100W charging; 200 MP main camera; NFC; IP69; 230 g. See details
4. OPPO Find X8 Ultra
The OPPO Find X8 Ultra earns fourth place with a DXOMark score of 168 and a MobileRank camera score of 94. Its overall score of 86 and performance score of 92 indicate a strong general-purpose flagship profile, while the AnTuTu result reaches 3,183,101. The 6,100 mAh battery receives a score of 78 and is estimated to provide 12.2 hours of use. Compared with the models above it, the main trade-off is a slightly lower camera rating, although its performance and battery figures remain competitive.
Key specs: DXOMark 168; MobileRank 86; camera score 94; AnTuTu 3,183,101; Snapdragon 8 Elite; 6.8-inch LTPO AMOLED 120Hz display; 6,100 mAh battery; 12.2-hour estimate; 80W charging; 50 MP main camera; NFC; IP68; 226 g. See details
5. Apple iPhone 17 Pro
The Apple iPhone 17 Pro matches the OPPO Find X8 Ultra with a DXOMark score of 168 and a camera score of 94. Its performance score is also 92, although its AnTuTu result of 2,568,709 is lower than the results recorded by the Android models immediately around it. The main limitation in the provided data is battery performance: its battery score is 37, with a 3,998 mAh capacity and an estimated 8.3 hours of use. At 206 g and with a 6.3-inch display, it is smaller and lighter than most other phones in this ranking.
Key specs: DXOMark 168; MobileRank 79; camera score 94; AnTuTu 2,568,709; Apple A19 Pro; 6.3-inch LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED 120Hz display; 3,998 mAh battery; 8.3-hour estimate; 40W charging; 48 MP main camera; NFC; IP68; 206 g. See details
6. Vivo X200 Ultra
The Vivo X200 Ultra takes sixth place with a DXOMark score of 167 and a MobileRank camera score of 93. Its overall rating of 86 and performance score of 92 are identical to those of the OPPO Find X8 Ultra, while its AnTuTu result is slightly lower at 3,092,340. Battery performance remains solid, with a score of 78, a 6,000 mAh capacity, and an estimated 12 hours of use. It therefore offers a balanced combination of camera ranking, processing performance, and endurance, without leading any individual category in this group.
Key specs: DXOMark 167; MobileRank 86; camera score 93; AnTuTu 3,092,340; Snapdragon 8 Elite; 6.8-inch LTPO AMOLED 120Hz display; 6,000 mAh battery; 12-hour estimate; 90W charging; 50 MP main camera; NFC; IP68; 229 g. See details
7. Xiaomi 17 Ultra
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra completes the top seven with a DXOMark score of 166 and a camera score of 93. Its overall MobileRank rating of 88 is higher than those of several models placed above it, largely supported by a performance score of 96 and an AnTuTu result of 3,593,401. The battery score is 80, with a 6,000 mAh battery and an estimated 12 hours of use. It is therefore a relevant choice for buyers who accept a slightly lower DXOMark result in exchange for stronger benchmark performance and competitive battery figures.
Key specs: DXOMark 166; MobileRank 88; camera score 93; AnTuTu 3,593,401; Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; 6.8-inch LTPO AMOLED 120Hz display; 6,000 mAh battery; 12-hour estimate; 90W charging; 50 MP main camera; NFC; IP68; 226 g. See details
How to choose
First, compare the DXOMark and MobileRank camera scores rather than relying only on the main camera’s megapixel count. The Huawei Pura 80 Ultra, for example, leads with DXOMark 175 despite having a 50 MP main camera, while the 200 MP Vivo models score 171 and 170.
Second, consider overall performance if the phone will also be used for demanding applications. AnTuTu results in this group range from 1,395,526 to 4,247,433, so phones with similar camera scores can differ substantially in benchmark performance.
Third, check battery score and estimated runtime together. Estimated endurance ranges from 8.3 hours for the iPhone 17 Pro to 14 hours for the Vivo X300 Ultra, while battery scores range from 37 to 85.
Finally, review practical features such as NFC, ingress protection, charging power, size, and weight. These details may be more important in daily use than a difference of one or two DXOMark points.