This ranking of the best phones under ₽100,000 for August 2026 is based on the MobileRank rating, which combines specifications and benchmark-derived scores across performance, cameras, and battery. The order follows the supplied MobileRank scores, with AnTuTu results, camera ratings, battery scores, and estimated battery life used to explain the differences between models. Any prices mentioned below are launch prices, not current retail prices.
1. Redmi K100 Pro Max
The Redmi K100 Pro Max leads this list with a MobileRank score of 94. Its strongest areas are performance and battery: the performance score is 98, AnTuTu reaches 3,942,923 points, and the battery score is 95. The 9,070 mAh battery is the largest among the seven highest-ranked models and is estimated to provide 17.5 hours of battery life. Its camera score of 90 is also competitive, while the 200 MP main camera, NFC, and IP69 protection add to the overall specification balance.
Key specs: Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; AnTuTu 3,942,923; 6.9" AMOLED 185Hz; 9,070 mAh; estimated 17.5 hours; 100W charging; 200 MP main camera; NFC; IP69; launch price ₽65,700 / $730. see details
2. Vivo X300 Ultra
The Vivo X300 Ultra ranks second with a MobileRank score of 91 and stands out primarily for performance and cameras. Its performance score is 99, while its AnTuTu result of 4,247,433 is higher than that of the Redmi K100 Pro Max. It also has the highest camera score in the top seven at 96, supported by a DXOMark score of 170 and a 200 MP main camera. Battery performance is less dominant than its camera and processor results, but a battery score of 85, 7,000 mAh capacity, and an estimated 14.0 hours still provide a strong numerical profile.
Key specs: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; AnTuTu 4,247,433; 6.8" LTPO OLED 120Hz; 7,000 mAh; estimated 14.0 hours; 100W charging; 200 MP main camera; DXOMark 170; NFC; IP69; 230 g; launch price ₽85,500 / $950. see details
3. Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has a MobileRank score of 89 and records the highest AnTuTu result among these seven phones at 4,602,290. Its performance score of 99 confirms that performance is its strongest measured category. Battery figures are also high, with a score of 92, a 7,400 mAh capacity, and an estimated 14.4 hours of use, while 120W charging is among the highest charging figures in this ranking. The main trade-off in the supplied scores is photography: its camera score is 78, noticeably below those of the models immediately around it.
Key specs: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; AnTuTu 4,602,290; 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 144Hz; 7,400 mAh; estimated 14.4 hours; 120W charging; 50 MP main camera; NFC; IP68; 227 g; launch price ₽71,910 / $799. see details
4. Motorola Edge 60 Pro
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro also scores 89 overall, but its profile is more balanced between performance and cameras. It has a performance score of 98, an AnTuTu result of 3,942,923, and a camera score of 90. Its battery score is 84, with a 5,200 mAh battery and an estimated 10.4 hours of battery life, which is the lowest estimated runtime among the seven phones in this list. On the other hand, its 125W charging figure is the highest of the seven, and its listed weight of 198 g is lower than that of the other models here with available weight data.
Key specs: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; AnTuTu 3,942,923; 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 120Hz; 5,200 mAh; estimated 10.4 hours; 125W charging; 200 MP main camera; 198 g; launch price ₽62,910 / $699. see details
5. Vivo X300s
The Vivo X300s receives a MobileRank score of 89 and places particular emphasis on camera capability according to the supplied ratings. Its camera score is 94, the second-highest figure among the seven models, while its performance score of 94 and AnTuTu result of 3,703,823 remain substantial. Battery performance is rated at 83, with a 7,100 mAh capacity and an estimated 13.8 hours of use. The combination of a 200 MP main camera and a 6.8-inch 144Hz LTPO AMOLED display helps define its specification profile without relying on a single dominant benchmark category.
Key specs: Dimensity 9500; AnTuTu 3,703,823; 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 144Hz; 7,100 mAh; estimated 13.8 hours; 90W charging; 200 MP main camera; 217 g; launch price ₽65,070 / $723. see details
6. Poco F8 Ultra
The Poco F8 Ultra is another model with an overall MobileRank score of 89. Its performance score is 97, backed by an AnTuTu result of 3,668,860, while the camera score is 90. Battery performance is rated at 85, and the 6,500 mAh battery is estimated to deliver 13.1 hours of use. NFC and IP68 protection are both listed, while 100W charging complements the battery specification.
Key specs: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; AnTuTu 3,668,860; 6.7" LTPO AMOLED 120Hz; 6,500 mAh; estimated 13.1 hours; 100W charging; 200 MP main camera; NFC; IP68; 218 g; launch price ₽65,610 / $729. see details
7. Honor Magic8
The Honor Magic8 completes the top seven with a MobileRank score of 88. Its strongest measured category is performance, with a score of 98 and an AnTuTu result of 4,037,547, which is higher than several phones ranked above it overall. The battery score is 85, supported by a 7,000 mAh battery and an estimated 14.2 hours of battery life, while the camera score is 87. It also includes NFC and IP68 protection, and at 205 g it is relatively light compared with several other models in this ranking for which weight data is available.
Key specs: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; AnTuTu 4,037,547; 6.6" Dynamic OLED 120Hz; 7,000 mAh; estimated 14.2 hours; 90W charging; 50 MP main camera; NFC; IP68; 205 g; launch price ₽56,250 / $625. see details
How to choose
When comparing these phones, start with the category that matters most for your usage rather than relying only on the overall MobileRank score. For performance, compare both the performance rating and AnTuTu result: for example, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra combines a performance score of 99 with 4,602,290 AnTuTu points, while the Honor Magic8 scores 98 in performance and reaches 4,037,547 points.
For photography, the camera score and DXOMark result can provide more useful comparative information than main-camera megapixels alone. Among these seven phones, the Vivo X300 Ultra has a camera score of 96 and a DXOMark score of 170, while several other models have no DXOMark result in the supplied data.
Battery capacity should also be considered together with the battery score and estimated operating time. The Redmi K100 Pro Max combines a 9,070 mAh battery, a battery score of 95, and an estimated 17.5 hours, whereas the Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a 5,200 mAh battery, an 84 battery score, and an estimated 10.4 hours.
Finally, check practical features individually. NFC is explicitly listed for the Redmi K100 Pro Max, Vivo X300 Ultra, Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, Poco F8 Ultra, and Honor Magic8, while IP68 or IP69 protection is also specified for those models. Where a field is not available in the data, it should not be assumed to be present or absent.